ASSOBRAFIR Ciência
https://assobrafirciencia.org/article/5de128b00e8825ae584ce1d5
ASSOBRAFIR Ciência
Artigo Original

A utilização de FiO2 inferior a 100% para hiperoxigenação de pacientes estáveis submetidos à aspiração endotraqueal

Utilization of fraction of inspired oxygen lower than 100% to hyperoxygenate stable patients who underwent endotracheal suctioning

Gisele do Carmo Leite Machado Diniz, Aline Oliveira Souza, Hellen Maia Dornelas Oliveira, Rafaela Cristina de Souza Arrais, Bruno Porto Pessoa, Pedro Henrique Scheidt Figueiredo

Downloads: 7
Views: 3654

Resumo

Introdução e objetivo: Pouco se sabe sobre a utilização de frações inspiradas de oxigênio (FiO2 ) inferiores a 100% para prevenir hipoxemia após aspiração endotraqueal (AE). O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar as repercussões da elevação da FiO2 a 50% acima da basal com a FiO2 de 100% durante a AE em pacientes estáveis ventilados mecanicamente. Métodos: Ensaio cruzado e randomizado em 17 pacientes (55,7±23,9 anos) submetidos a 2 sessões de AE (intervalo de 6hs) com hiperoxigenação prévia por dois valores de FiO2 : 50% acima do valor basal e 100%. A freqüência cardíaca (FC), pressão arterial média (PAM), saturação periférica de oxigênio (SpO2 ) e frequência respiratória (FR) foram registradas na condição basal, 5 minutos após o ajuste da FiO2 (PRÉ), assim como 1º e 5º minutos após o término dos procedimentos. Resultados: Na comparação intragrupos a SpO2 aumentou em todas as fases dos dois protocolos, comparada a condição basal. Houve aumento da FC no 1ºmin após AE no protocolo com elevação da FiO2 a 50%, em relação ao momento PRÉ e basal, assim como a FR no procedimento com FiO2 a 100%. Já a PAM elevou-se apenas no 1º min, comparada a condição basal, no protocolo de aumento da FiO2 a 50%. Na análise intergrupos, a SpO2 foi maior no procedimento com FiO2 a 100% no 1º min após AE, mas sem relevância clínica, assim como a FR. Conclusão: A hiperoxigenação com elevação da FiO2 a 50% acima da basal pode ser utilizada para prevenir a hipoxemia durante a AE em pacientes adultos e estáveis sob ventilação mecânica.

Palavras-chave

Aspiração mecânica; Respiração artificial; Oxigenoterapia.

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Little is known about the use of fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2 ) lower than 100% to prevent hypoxemia after endotracheal suctioning (ES). The aim of this study was to compare the repercussions of increasing FiO2 to 50% above the baseline FiO2 with a FiO2 of 100% during ES in mechanically ventilated patients. Methods: A randomized crossover trial with 17 patients (55,7±23,9 years) who underwent 2 sessions of ES (break of 6 hours between them) with prior hyperoxygenation with two different values of FiO2 : 50% above the baseline and 100%. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) and breathing rate (BR) were recorded at baseline, 5 minutes after adjusting the FiO2 , as well as 1 and 5 minutes after the end of the procedures. Results: The intra-group comparison demonstrated that SpO2 increased in all phases of both protocols compared to baseline values. There was an increase in HR at the first min after ES in the protocol with increasing of the FiO2 to 50%, compared to pre-procedure and baseline, as well as the BR in the procedure with FiO2 of 100%. On the other hand, MAP increased only at the firstmin compared to baseline in the protocol with increasing of the FiO2 to 50%. In the intergroup analysis, SpO2 and BR were higher in the procedure with FiO2 of 100% at the first min after the ES, however without clinical relevance. Conclusion: Hyperoxygenation with a FiO2 set at 50% above baseline value can be used to prevent hypoxemia during ES in adult and stable mechanically ventilated patients.

Keywords

Mechanical aspiration; Artificial breathing; Oxygen therapy

Referências

1. Carvalho CRR, Toufen Junior C, Franca SA. Ventilação Mecânica: princípios, análise gráfica e modalidades ventilatórias. J Bras Pneumol. 2007 Jul;33(Supl 2):S54-S70.

2. Grossi SAA, Santos BMO. Prevenção da hipoxemia durante a aspiração endotraqueal. Rev. LatinoAm. Enfermagem. 1994 Jul;2(2):87-102.

3. Van de Leur JP, Zwaveling JH, Loef BG, Van der Schans CP. Endotracheal suctioning versus minimally invasive airway suctioning in intubated patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Mar;29(3):426-32.

4. Nakagawa NK, Franchini ML, Driusso P, de Oliveira LR, Saldiva PH, Lorenzi-Filho G. Mucociliary clearance is impaired in acutely ill patients. Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2772-7.

5. Lookinland S, Appel PL. Hemodynamic and oxygen transport changes following endotracheal suctioning in trauma patients. Nurs Res. 1991 May-Jun;40(3):133-9.

6. Farias GM, Freire ILS, Ramos CS. Aspiração endotraqueal: estudo em pacientes de uma unidade de urgência e terapia intensiva de um hospital da região metropolitana de Natal – RN. Rev Eletrônica Enfermagem. 2006;8(1):63-9.

7. Clark AP, Winsolw EH, Tyler DO, White KM. Effects of endotracheal suctioning on mixed venous oxygen saturation and heart rate in critically ill adults. Heart Lung. 1990 Sep; 19(5 Pt):552-7.

8. Oh H, Seo W. A meta-analysis of the effects of various interventions in preventing endotracheal suction-induced hypoxemia. J Clin Nurs. 2003 Nov;12(6):912-24.

9. Bourgault AM, Brown CA, Hains SM, Parlow JL. Effects of endotracheal tube suctioning on arterial oxygen tension and heart rate variability. Biol Res Nurs. 2006 Apr;7(4):268-78.

10. Pritchard M, Flenady V, Woodgate P. Preoxygenation for tracheal suctioning in intubated, ventilated newborn infants. Cochrane database of Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD000427.

11. Jelic S, Cunningham JA, Factor P. Clinical review: airway hygiene in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2008;12(2):209.

12. Pedersen CM, Rosendahl-Nielsen M, Hjermind J, Egerod I. Endotracheal suctioning of the adult intubed patient – What is the evidence? Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009 Feb;25(1):21-30.

13. Benoît Z, Wicky S, Fischer JF, Frascarolo P, Chapuis C, Spahn DR et al. The effect of increased FiO2 before tracheal extubation on postoperative Atelectasis. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1777- 81.

14. Phillips M, Cataneo RN, Greenberg J, Grodman R, Gunawardena R, Naidu A. Effect of oxygen on breath markers of oxidative stress. Eur Respir J. 2003 Jan;21(1):48-51.

15. Sola A, Chow L, Rogido M. Retinopathy of prematurity and oxygen therapy: A changing relationship. An Pediatr (Barc). 2005 Jan;62(1):48-63.

16. Maggiore SM, Lellouche F, Pigeot J, Taille S, Deye N, Durrmeyer X, et al. Prevention of endotracheal suctionin-induced alveolar derecruitment in acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 May 1;167(9):1215-24.

17. Helayel PE, Filho GRO, Marcon L, Pederneiras FH, Nicolodi MA, Pederneiras SG. Gradiente SpO2 - SaO2 Durante Ventilação Mecânica em Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2001 Jul-Ago; 51(4):305-10.

18. Van de Louw A, Cracco C, Cerf C, Harf A, Duvaldestin P, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Accuracy of pulse oximetry in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2001 Oct;27(10):1606-13.

19. Piva JP, Garcia PCR, Santana JCB, Barreto SSM. Insuficiência respiratória na criança. J Pediatria. 1998;74(Supl 1):S99-S111.

20. Rogge JA, Bunde L, Baun MM. Pulmonary aspects of critical care: Effectiveness of oxygen concentrations of less than 100% before and after endotracheal suction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Heart Lung. 1989 Jan;18(1):64-71.

21. Fernández MD, Piacentini E, Blanch L, Fernández R. Changes in lung volume with three systems of endotracheal suctioning with and without pre-oxygenation in patients with mild-to-moderate lung failure. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Dec;30(12):2210-15.

22. Demir F, Dramali A. Requirement for 100% oxygen before and after closed suction. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51(3):245-51.

23. Brochard L, Mion G, Isabey D, Bertrand C, Messadi AA, Mancebo J, et al. Constant-flow insufflations prevents arterial oxygen desaturation during endotracheal suctioning. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Aug;144(2):395–400.

24. Nishino T, Tagaito Y, Isono S. Cough and other reflexes on irritation of airway mucosa in man. Pulm Pharmacol. 1996 Oct-Dec;9(5-6):285-92.

25. Johnson LK, Kearney PA, Johnson SB, Niblett JB, MacMillan NL, McClain RE. Closed versus open endotracheal suctioning:costs and physiologic consequences. Crit Care Med. 1994 Apr;22(4):658-66.

26. Lee CK, Ng KS, Tan SG, Ang R. Effect of different endotracheal suctioning systems on cardiorespiratory parameters of ventilated patients. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2001 May;30(3): 239-44.

27. Caramez MP, Schettino G, Suchodolski K, Nishida T, Harris S, Malhotra A, Kacmarek RM. The impact of endotracheal suctioning on gas exchange and hemodynamics during lung-protectiva ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Care. 2006 May;51(5):497-502.

28. Cereda M, Villa F, Colombo E, Greco G, Nacoti M, Pesenti A. Closed system endotracheal suctioning maintains lung volume during volume-controlled mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2001 Apr;27(4):648-54.

5de128b00e8825ae584ce1d5 assobrafir Articles
Links & Downloads

ASSOBRAFIR Ciência

Share this page
Page Sections